Classical Logic and Neutrosophic Logic. Answers to K. Georgiev

Authors

  • Florentin Smarandache University of New Mexico, Mathematics & Science Department, 705 Gurley Ave., Gallup, NM 87301, USA E-mail:

Keywords:

: Neutrosophic Logic, Neutrosophic Logical Systems, Single Valued Neutrosophic Set, Neutrosophic Logic Negations, Degree of Dependence and Independence, Degrees of Membership, Standard and Non-Standard Real Subset

Abstract

Abstract. In this paper, we make distinctions between Classical Logic (where the propositions are 100% true, or 100 false) and the Neutrosophic Logic (where one deals with partially true, partially indeterminate and partially false propositions) in order to respond to K. Georgiev’s criticism [1]. We recall that if an axiom is true in a classical logic system, it is not necessarily that the axiom be valid in a modern (fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, neutrosophic etc.) logic system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-15

Issue

Vol. 13 (2016): Neutrosophic Sets and Systems

Section

SI#1,2024: Neutrosophical Advancements And Their Impact on Research

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.

How to Cite

Smarandache, F. . (2016). Classical Logic and Neutrosophic Logic. Answers to K. Georgiev. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 13, 79-83. http://fs.unm.edu/nss8/index.php/111/article/view/513

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>