Formalizing Contextual Truth Flips: Upside-Down Logic and ItsVariants

Autores/as

  • Takaaki Fujita ndependent Researcher, Tokyo, Japan. T Autor/a
  • Arif Mehmood Department of Mathematics, Institute of Numerical Sciences, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan 29050, KPK, Pakistan Autor/a

Palabras clave:

Upside-down logic, defeasible logic, belief-based logic, paraconsistent logic, dynamic epistemic logic, abductive logic

Resumen

In real settings, conclusions can flip: a claim once treated as true becomes false, or a prohibited
action later becomes required. We call this phenomenon Upside-Down Logic. Upside-Down Logic provides a
formal operator that, given a contextual trigger, reverses the accepted outcome (True→False / False→True)
while keeping the underlying information rather than discarding it. We define several concrete variants — defea-
sible, belief-based, paraconsistent, dynamic epistemic, and abductive — and show how each realizes controlled
reversal through priority flips, entrenchment inversion, model update, or explanation reordering. These log-
ics model realistic situations such as building access in emergencies, medication policy after contraindications,
travel advisories, market disclosures, and security assessment

a

Descargas

Publicado

2025-11-23

Número

Sección

Artículos

Cómo citar

Formalizing Contextual Truth Flips: Upside-Down Logic and ItsVariants. (2025). Neutrosophic Computing and Machine Learning, 41, 191-212. https://fs.unm.edu/NCML_2/index.php/NCML/article/view/43

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a

Artículos similares

1-10 de 37

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.