Public Administrative Exorbitance and the Principle of Equality: Analysis of Its Implications for Operational Functionality and the Management of General Welfare.

Abstract

Public administrative excessiveness and its relationship to the principle of equality raises a fundamental problem: how the excessive exercise of administrative powers can affect equity and justice in public administration. The problem focuses on identifying situations in which administrative excessiveness, understood as the excessive or inappropriate use of powers by the administration, can generate inequalities among citizens and negatively affect the operational functionality of the State and the management of general welfare. The methodology used to address this issue includes a comparative and analytical approach, examining cases in which administrative excessiveness has been evident and evaluating the consequences of such actions on the operation of the administrative system and on equal treatment. The overall objective is to analyze how administrative excessiveness can impact the implementation of the principle of equality and propose mechanisms to mitigate its negative effects on public management. The expected outcomes include the identification of patterns of administrative excessiveness that compromise equality, as well as the development of specific recommendations to strengthen the monitoring and control of these excesses by the competent institutions. This analysis will contribute to improving efficiency and equity in public administration, ensuring that administrative decisions and actions are aligned with the principle of equality and promote general welfare in a fair and equitable manner.