Neutrosophic method for the recommendation on precautionary measures as an instrument to guarantee constitutional rights

Abstract

This study aims to implement a neutrosophic method for the recomentation of precautionary measures as an instrument for guaranteeing constitutional rights. Within the Ecuadorian legal framework, precautionary measures seek to prevent violations of fundamental rights and ensure effective protection in judicial proceedings. Through a doctrinal and jurisprudential review, the scope of the ruling is assessed in consolidating criteria that reinforce the application of precautionary measures in contexts of vulnerability and violations of rights. The study highlights the importance of proportionality, immediacy, and effectiveness in the adoption of these measures, ensuring that their application does not represent a violation of procedural guarantees. Furthermore, the national and international precedents that have influenced the construction of the ruling are examined, establishing their impact on the interpretation and application of effective judicial protection. The results conclude that the ruling represents a step forward in consolidating judicial oversight of precautionary measures, strengthening their role as a safeguard for the exercise of constitutional rights and providing a framework for evaluating the effectiveness of these measures in protecting rights in situations of risk.