Neutrosophic Evaluation of Legal Strategies for Decision-making in a Digital Context

Abstract

The present study focused on the protection of intellectual property rights in the digital era. A methodology incorpo
rating neutrosophy was applied to evaluate and compare different proposed legal alternatives. The inherent complexity of legal 
issues, characterized by ambiguous facts and diverse perspectives, underscored the relevance of neutrosophy in this field. The 
ELECTRE I method was adapted to a neutrosophic structure by incorporating bipolar neutrosophic numbers to manage uncer
tainty and ambiguity in decision-making. The final results revealed a strong preference for the "Legal Education and Training" 
alternative due to its cost and time effectiveness. The study provided a solid foundation for informed decision-making in the 
realm of intellectual property protection in the digital era, supported by the use of neutrosophic theory and the ability to handle 
indeterminacies inherent in decision-making.