A novel plithogenic MCDM framework for credit evaluation of bidding and tendering in construction projects with contradictions

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel approach to decision-making by integrating Plithogenic modeling 
methodology with multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques. Traditional Plithogenic decision
making frameworks primarily rely on degrees of appurtenance as their foundation. However, this study 
presents a new paradigm that leverages degrees of contradiction to rank alternatives, offering a unique and 
innovative perspective compared to conventional methods.  The research employs the PROMETHEE 
method to evaluate and rank alternatives, with the assessment carried out by four experienced experts 
using Plithogenic numbers. A total of ten criteria and five alternatives were analyzed in this study. The 
findings highlight that the Financial Stability criterion holds the highest importance, while the Risk 
Management Strategy criterion is weighted the lowest. This demonstrates the capability of the proposed 
method to address complex decision-making scenarios in the construction bidding and tendering context.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14728420