Quality Review of Computer Digital Media Art Design using Neutrosophic Logic: A Case Study

Abstract

 Evaluating the quality of Computer Digital Media Art Design is complex because it 
involves both subjective artistic elements and objective technical criteria. This study uses the 
multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method to deal with different criteria. Two MCDM 
methods are used in this study such as Preference Selection Index (PSI) Method to compute the 
criteria weights and the RATGOS method to rank the alternatives. These methods are used 
neutrosophic sets to dela with vague and uncertainty information. Eight criteria and seven 
alternatives are used to select the best alternatives. Four experts have evaluated these criteria and 
alternatives. An example is conducted to show the validation of the proposed approach. The 
sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis are applied in this study to show the stability of the 
ranks and the effectiveness of the proposed approach. 

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14942138