SuperHyperSoft Set for Selection Strategies for Achieving Human Rights in Artificial Intelligence through Civil Public Interest Litigation

Abstract

Making sure AI technologies respect and uphold human rights is crucial as AI gets more 
and more integrated into social structures. AI systems that are unethical or discriminatory may 
be challenged in court through civil public interest litigation (CPIL). To assess and choose 
strategic options for realizing human rights through CPIL in the AI domain, this study creates a 
SuperHyperSoft Set model with multicriteria decision making (MCDM) approach. We evaluate 
eight workable options and identify 14 criteria that represent ethical, legal, technological, and 
social aspects. The SuperHyperSoft Set is used to deal with different criteria values. ORESTE is 
used to rank the alternatives.  The suggested model assists decision-makers in choosing the best 
advocacy and litigation tactics that are in line with AI deployment's human rights safeguards. 

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15265443