Analyzing Interdisciplinary Education in General Medi cine Using Smarandache's Multivalued Logic Hypothesis  Theory  and Plithogenic Probability

Dolores Hernandez De la Cantera; Rosangela Caicedo Quiroz; Mairim Lago Queija; Jeanntte Rodriguez Gonzalez; Maikel Y. Leyva Vazquez

Authors

Dolores Hernandez De la Cantera Facultad de Ciencias Médicas Victoria de Girón, La Habana, Cuba.
Rosangela Caicedo Quiroz Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador (UBE), km 5.5 Vía Durán, Guayas, Ecuador
Mairim Lago Queija Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de La Habana, Facultad"Victoria de Girón". La Habana, Cuba.
Jeanntte Rodriguez Gonzalez Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de La Habana, Facultad"Victoria de Girón". La Habana, Cuba.
Maikel Y. Leyva Vazquez Universidad de Guayaquil (UG), Ciudadela Universitaria, Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador.

Abstract

Smarandache extended the concept of falsifiability to include hypotheses that involve multiple values. Smarandache's
extension of classical logic introduces Partial Falsifiability within multi-valued logic, which allows for the inclusion of partial
truth values, uncertainties, and false values, unlike traditional falsifiability which only classifies hypotheses as completely true
or false. Using this approach this study investigates specifically the concept of interdisciplinarity in the field of integral general
medicine, with a specific emphasis on the integration of nursing procedures. The method employs sentiment analysis of scientific
questions using the Consensus tool and plithogenic statistics to assess complex hypotheses. The findings indicate that the com
bination of nursing procedures and interprofessional approaches greatly improves teamwork, communication, and clinical com
petence. The results suggest a high probability of truth (0.67), some indeterminacy (0.33), and a low probability of falsity (0.17).
Future research will focus on utilizing alternative sentiment analysis tools and incorporating the concept of fallibility into hy
potheses using Smarandache's multivalued logic in different contexts.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13182361