Analyzing Interdisciplinary Education in General Medi cine Using Smarandache's Multivalued Logic Hypothesis Theory and Plithogenic Probability

Abstract

Smarandache extended the concept of falsifiability to include hypotheses that involve multiple values. Smarandache's 
extension of classical logic introduces Partial Falsifiability within multi-valued logic, which allows for the inclusion of partial 
truth values, uncertainties, and false values, unlike traditional falsifiability which only classifies hypotheses as completely true 
or false. Using this approach this study investigates specifically the concept of interdisciplinarity in the field of integral general 
medicine, with a specific emphasis on the integration of nursing procedures. The method employs sentiment analysis of scientific 
questions using the Consensus tool and plithogenic statistics to assess complex hypotheses. The findings indicate that the com
bination of nursing procedures and interprofessional approaches greatly improves teamwork, communication, and clinical com
petence. The results suggest a high probability of truth (0.67), some indeterminacy (0.33), and a low probability of falsity (0.17).  
Future research will focus on utilizing alternative sentiment analysis tools and incorporating the concept of fallibility into hy
potheses using Smarandache's multivalued logic in different contexts.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13182361